Scars from skin picking are one of the most distressing physical consequences of dermatillomania, both because they're visible reminders of episodes the person wishes hadn't happened, and because they can themselves become picking targets, perpetuating the cycle. Understanding how scars form and what genuinely works to prevent and improve them is valuable both for skin health and for breaking the scar-to-picking feedback loop.
Skin picking typically causes three types of skin changes that fall under the broad category of "scarring":
Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), flat dark marks left after a wound heals. PIH is the most common consequence of picking, particularly on the face. It's not technically a scar (it's a pigmentation change, not a structural change in the skin), which means it has a better prognosis than true scarring. PIH fades over time, typically several months to two years, and this process can be significantly accelerated with appropriate treatment. People with medium to deeper skin tones are more prone to PIH.
Atrophic scarring, depressed, pitted scars that result from tissue loss below the skin surface. These are more common when picking has repeatedly traumatised the same site, particularly on the face. Atrophic scars are genuine structural changes that require more active treatment.
Hypertrophic or keloid scarring, raised scars that result from overproduction of collagen during healing. These are less common from picking than from surgical wounds but can occur, particularly on the chest, shoulders, and neck. People with darker skin tones have higher keloid susceptibility.
The most impactful scar prevention step, beyond the obvious one of reducing picking, is appropriate wound care during the healing phase:
PIH is the type of marking most people with dermatillomania are trying to address. Several evidence-supported topical ingredients reduce PIH:
A note on hydroquinone: formerly the standard for PIH treatment, it's now restricted or banned in some countries due to long-term safety concerns. Where it remains available, it's typically used at 2–4% under medical supervision for limited periods. The alternatives above are generally preferred for unsupervised use.
Atrophic scars (pitting, depressed texture) don't respond well to topical treatments alone because the problem is structural. Options with better evidence:
"Scars from picking aren't permanent life sentences. Most PIH fades substantially within 6–18 months with appropriate care. Even structural scarring has meaningful treatment options. The skin is more resilient than the shame would have you believe."
A final note: scar treatment is most effective, and safest, when the picking that caused the scarring is being actively addressed. Treating scars while continuing to create new ones is like treating flood damage without stopping the leak. Behavioural recovery and skin recovery are most powerful pursued together.
Learning about your skin picking makes a real difference both on the inside and outside, with that awareness creating a ripple effect. If you're ready to explore a compassionate guide to kick-start your picking management, start here.